+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 leads with 36.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview was released as an early access version of Gemini 2.5 Pro, designed to allow developers and enterprises to experiment with next-generation capabilities before general availability. Built to gather feedback and demonstrate upcoming features, it provided a window into the evolution of Google's flagship model.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
2 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
2025-06-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Average Score:87.2%(+36.6%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:50.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Avg Score:87.2%(+36.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:50.6%
Providers:0