Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 leads with 53.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $11.22 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview was released as an early access version of Gemini 2.5 Pro, designed to allow developers and enterprises to experiment with next-generation capabilities before general availability. Built to gather feedback and demonstrate upcoming features, it provided a window into the evolution of Google's flagship model.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
8 months newer

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
2025-06-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra