+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 leads with 24.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview was released as an early access version of Gemini 2.5 Pro, designed to allow developers and enterprises to experiment with next-generation capabilities before general availability. Built to gather feedback and demonstrate upcoming features, it provided a window into the evolution of Google's flagship model.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B was created through NVIDIA's optimization of Llama 3.3, designed to provide a balanced option with 49 billion parameters. Built to serve as a versatile mid-to-large-scale offering, it combines NVIDIA's customization expertise with Meta's foundation architecture.
2 months newer
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
2025-06-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Average Score:87.2%(+24.7%)
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Average Score:62.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
2023-12-31
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Avg Score:87.2%(+24.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Avg Score:62.5%
Providers:0