+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 leads with 49.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview was released as an early access version of Gemini 2.5 Pro, designed to allow developers and enterprises to experiment with next-generation capabilities before general availability. Built to gather feedback and demonstrate upcoming features, it provided a window into the evolution of Google's flagship model.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 MoE was created using a mixture-of-experts architecture, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency through sparse activation. Built to combine the benefits of larger models with practical computational requirements, it represents Microsoft's exploration of efficient scaling techniques.
9 months newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
2025-06-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Average Score:86.4%(+49.6%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:36.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Avg Score:86.4%(+49.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:36.8%
Providers:0