Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 12B leads with 13.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 852.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 12B. Gemma 3 12B is $11.10 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemma 3 12B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.6% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MRCR (93.0%), AIME 2024 (92.0%), Global-MMLU-Lite (88.6%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemma 3 12B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (94.4%), IFEval (88.9%), DocVQA (87.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemma 3 12B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 39 common benchmarks
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemma 3 12B
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemini 2.5 Pro
ZeroEval
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemma 3 12B
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemma 3 12B
Gemma 3 12B
DeepInfra