+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemma 3 12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 35.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 852.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 12B. Gemma 3 12B is $11.10 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro was developed as Google's most intelligent AI model, designed to comprehend vast datasets and challenging problems from diverse information sources including text, audio, images, and video. Built to handle complex reasoning and multi-step problem solving, it represents Google's flagship offering for enterprise and advanced applications.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
2 months newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input:$1.25
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($11.10 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Average Score:74.1%(+35.2%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:38.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Avg Score:74.1%(+35.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:38.9%
Providers:1