+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 31.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 852.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $10.95 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro was developed as Google's most intelligent AI model, designed to comprehend vast datasets and challenging problems from diverse information sources including text, audio, images, and video. Built to handle complex reasoning and multi-step problem solving, it represents Google's flagship offering for enterprise and advanced applications.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
2 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input:$1.25
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($10.95 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Average Score:74.1%(+31.6%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:42.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Avg Score:74.1%(+31.6%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:42.5%
Providers:2