+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 16.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs. Gemini 2.5 Pro is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro was developed as Google's most intelligent AI model, designed to comprehend vast datasets and challenging problems from diverse information sources including text, audio, images, and video. Built to handle complex reasoning and multi-step problem solving, it represents Google's flagship offering for enterprise and advanced applications.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct-0905 represents a specific release iteration of the K2 Instruct model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements. Built to provide enhanced instruction-following based on deployment feedback, it continues the evolution of Moonshot's instruction-tuned offerings.
3 months newer
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Average Score:74.8%(+16.3%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Average Score:58.5%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Coding63.2%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Coding65.8%(+2.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Avg Score:74.8%(+16.3%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Avg Score:58.5%
Providers:0