+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 8.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs. Gemini 2.5 Pro is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro was developed as Google's most intelligent AI model, designed to comprehend vast datasets and challenging problems from diverse information sources including text, audio, images, and video. Built to handle complex reasoning and multi-step problem solving, it represents Google's flagship offering for enterprise and advanced applications.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B was developed as NVIDIA's largest Nemotron variant, designed to provide maximum capability through extensive customization of large-scale foundations. Built with 253 billion parameters and NVIDIA's specialized training, it represents the flagship offering in the Nemotron family.
1 month newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Average Score:83.0%(+8.7%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:74.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Avg Score:83.0%(+8.7%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:74.3%
Providers:0