+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 16.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is $11.15 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.6% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MRCR (93.0%), AIME 2024 (92.0%), Global-MMLU-Lite (88.6%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (91.1%), DocVQA (88.4%), ChartQA (83.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input:$1.25
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.05($11.15 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 25 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Average Score:44.6%(+16.6%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Average Score:28.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Avg Score:44.6%(+16.6%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Avg Score:28.0%
Providers:6