Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 39.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is $11.15 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Pro was developed as Google's most intelligent AI model, designed to comprehend vast datasets and challenging problems from diverse information sources including text, audio, images, and video. Built to handle complex reasoning and multi-step problem solving, it represents Google's flagship offering for enterprise and advanced applications.
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
7 months newer

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Pro
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Pro

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Sambanova
Together