Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 27.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is $10.50 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Pro was developed as Google's most intelligent AI model, designed to comprehend vast datasets and challenging problems from diverse information sources including text, audio, images, and video. Built to handle complex reasoning and multi-step problem solving, it represents Google's flagship offering for enterprise and advanced applications.
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
7 months newer

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Pro
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Pro

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Together