Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 32.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $10.85 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Pro was developed as Google's most intelligent AI model, designed to comprehend vast datasets and challenging problems from diverse information sources including text, audio, images, and video. Built to handle complex reasoning and multi-step problem solving, it represents Google's flagship offering for enterprise and advanced applications.
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
5 months newer

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06

Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Pro
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Pro

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together