+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Mistral NeMo Instruct. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $10.95 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro was developed as Google's most intelligent AI model, designed to comprehend vast datasets and challenging problems from diverse information sources including text, audio, images, and video. Built to handle complex reasoning and multi-step problem solving, it represents Google's flagship offering for enterprise and advanced applications.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
10 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input:$1.25
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($10.95 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2