Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 12.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 814.1K more tokens in context window than o3. o3 is $1.25 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.6% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MRCR (93.0%), AIME 2024 (92.0%), Global-MMLU-Lite (88.6%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
o3 is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.5% across 22 benchmarks. It excels particularly in COLLIE (98.4%), AIME 2024 (91.6%), ARC-AGI (88.0%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemini 2.5 Pro
o3
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 30 common benchmarks
Gemini 2.5 Pro
o3
o3
2024-05-31
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemini 2.5 Pro
ZeroEval
Gemini 2.5 Pro
o3
Gemini 2.5 Pro
o3
o3
OpenAI