Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 27.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is $11.10 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Pro was developed as Google's most intelligent AI model, designed to comprehend vast datasets and challenging problems from diverse information sources including text, audio, images, and video. Built to handle complex reasoning and multi-step problem solving, it represents Google's flagship offering for enterprise and advanced applications.
Microsoft
Phi-4 Multimodal was created to handle multiple input modalities including text, images, and potentially other formats. Built to extend Phi-4's efficiency into multimodal applications, it demonstrates that compact models can successfully integrate diverse information types.
3 months newer

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Microsoft
2025-02-01

Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
2024-06-01
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Pro
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Pro

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
DeepInfra