+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 18.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs. Gemini 2.5 Pro is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro was developed as Google's most intelligent AI model, designed to comprehend vast datasets and challenging problems from diverse information sources including text, audio, images, and video. Built to handle complex reasoning and multi-step problem solving, it represents Google's flagship offering for enterprise and advanced applications.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended analytical thinking into the Phi-4 architecture, designed to spend more time on complex problem-solving. Built to combine compact model efficiency with reasoning depth, it represents Microsoft's exploration of thoughtful small models.
20 days newer
Phi 4 Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Average Score:86.0%(+18.0%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Average Score:68.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
Phi 4 Reasoning
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Avg Score:86.0%(+18.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning
Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:0