+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini Diffusion vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct leads with 11.5% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 10 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (89.6%), MBPP (76.0%), Global-MMLU-Lite (69.1%). Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (91.1%), DocVQA (88.4%), ChartQA (83.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Gemini Diffusion
2025-05-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Average Score:23.5%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Average Score:35.0%(+11.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
6 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Avg Score:23.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Avg Score:35.0%(+11.5%)
Providers:6