+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini Diffusion vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct leads with 20.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 10 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (89.6%), MBPP (76.0%), Global-MMLU-Lite (69.1%). Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.3% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (92.3%), DocVQA (90.1%), MGSM (86.9%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Gemini Diffusion
2025-05-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Average Score:21.3%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Average Score:42.1%(+20.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
5 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Avg Score:21.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Avg Score:42.1%(+20.8%)
Providers:5