+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini Diffusion vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads with 4.5% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion was developed as a specialized model for image generation, designed to create high-quality visual content through diffusion-based techniques. Built to complement the text and multimodal capabilities of the Gemini family, it extends Google's AI capabilities into creative visual generation tasks.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
5 months newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Gemini Diffusion
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Average Score:65.0%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:69.5%(+4.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Avg Score:65.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:69.5%(+4.5%)
Providers:9