+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini Diffusion vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout leads with 17.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 10 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (89.6%), MBPP (76.0%), Global-MMLU-Lite (69.1%). Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.3% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (90.6%), ChartQA (88.8%). With a 20.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Gemini Diffusion
2025-05-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Average Score:24.7%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:42.5%(+17.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
6 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Avg Score:24.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:42.5%(+17.8%)
Providers:6