+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini Diffusion vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 leads with 4.3% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion was developed as a specialized model for image generation, designed to create high-quality visual content through diffusion-based techniques. Built to complement the text and multimodal capabilities of the Gemini family, it extends Google's AI capabilities into creative visual generation tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 was introduced as the fourth generation of Microsoft's small language model series, designed to push the boundaries of what compact models can achieve. Built with advanced training techniques and architectural improvements, it demonstrates continued progress in efficient, high-quality language models.
5 months newer
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Gemini Diffusion
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Average Score:65.0%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:69.3%(+4.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Avg Score:65.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:69.3%(+4.3%)
Providers:1