+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 2 9B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 4.5% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B was created as a more compact open-source model, designed to deliver capable performance with reduced computational requirements. Built with 9 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it serves applications where efficiency and accessibility are valued alongside the benefits of open-source availability.
Launched on the same date
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Gemma 2 9B
2024-06-27
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:69.1%(+4.5%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Average Score:64.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:69.1%(+4.5%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Avg Score:64.6%
Providers:0