+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 3 12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 12B leads with 26.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3 12B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
8 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:57.7%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:84.2%(+26.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:57.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:84.2%(+26.5%)
Providers:1