+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 3 1B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 10.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
8 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:57.7%(+10.8%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:46.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:57.7%(+10.8%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:46.9%
Providers:0