+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 3 1B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 18.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (80.2%), GSM8k (62.8%), Natural2Code (56.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Average performance across 30 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:36.9%(+18.9%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:17.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:36.9%(+18.9%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:17.9%
Providers:0