+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 29.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Gemma 3 27B is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
8 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:57.7%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:86.8%(+29.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:57.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:86.8%(+29.1%)
Providers:2