+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 3 4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 4B leads with 17.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3 4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
8 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:57.7%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:74.8%(+17.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:57.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:74.8%(+17.2%)
Providers:1