+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 3n E2B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 13.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B was created as a specialized efficient variant, designed for deployment in edge and mobile environments with strict resource constraints. Built with optimizations for edge computing, it brings Gemma capabilities to devices and applications where traditional models would be impractical.
12 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Gemma 3n E2B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:74.4%(+13.7%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Average Score:60.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:74.4%(+13.7%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Avg Score:60.8%
Providers:0