+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 2.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
12 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:63.2%(+2.1%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:61.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:63.2%(+2.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:61.1%
Providers:0