+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 10.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
10 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:71.6%(+10.8%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:60.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:71.6%(+10.8%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:60.8%
Providers:0