+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 36.6% higher average benchmark score. GPT-3.5 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 8 benchmarks. Notable strengths include DROP (70.2%), MMLU (69.8%), HumanEval (68.0%). The model is available through 2 API providers.
1 year newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:52.7%(+36.6%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:16.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:52.7%(+36.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:16.1%
Providers:2