+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs GPT-4.1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 leads with 15.0% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 represents an iterative improvement in the GPT-4 series, developed to refine the foundational capabilities established by GPT-4. Built to incorporate learnings and optimizations from the deployment of previous versions, it continues the evolution of OpenAI's flagship model line with enhanced reliability and performance.
9 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
GPT-4.1
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:75.2%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Average Score:90.2%(+15.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
1 providers
OpenAI
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:75.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Avg Score:90.2%(+15.0%)
Providers:1