+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs GPT OSS 120B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 30.6% higher average benchmark score. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.7% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.0%), CodeForces (87.4%), GPQA (80.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:50.3%(+30.6%)
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Average Score:19.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
5 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:50.3%(+30.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Avg Score:19.6%
Providers:5