+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 16.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is a language model developed by IBM. The model shows competitive results across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AttaQ (86.1%), HumanEval (82.4%), HumanEval+ (78.3%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents IBM's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
Average performance across 25 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:44.2%(+16.8%)
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:27.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:44.2%(+16.8%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:27.4%
Providers:0