+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Grok-2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 27.6% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
1 month newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:56.4%
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:84.0%(+27.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
1 providers
xAI
Throughput:
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:56.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:84.0%(+27.6%)
Providers:1