+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Grok-2 mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 mini leads with 25.2% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-2 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 Mini was created as a more efficient variant of Grok 2, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make Grok 2's advancements accessible to applications with tighter resource constraints, it balances performance with practical deployment needs.
1 month newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:56.4%
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:81.6%(+25.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:56.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:81.6%(+25.2%)
Providers:0