+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads with 7.7% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.7% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM-8K (CoT) (95.1%), ARC-C (94.8%), API-Bank (90.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
26 days newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 31 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:35.7%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Average Score:43.4%(+7.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:35.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Avg Score:43.4%(+7.7%)
Providers:9