+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 16.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:50.3%(+16.3%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:33.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:50.3%(+16.3%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:33.9%
Providers:0