+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 17.6% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:50.3%(+17.6%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:32.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:50.3%(+17.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:32.7%
Providers:9