+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads with 28.7% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B was created through NVIDIA's optimization of Llama 3.3, designed to provide a balanced option with 49 billion parameters. Built to serve as a versatile mid-to-large-scale offering, it combines NVIDIA's customization expertise with Meta's foundation architecture.
8 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:62.6%
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Average Score:91.3%(+28.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:62.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Avg Score:91.3%(+28.7%)
Providers:0