+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 24.5% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 81.0% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.6%), MT-Bench (91.7%), MBPP (91.3%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:50.3%(+24.5%)
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Average Score:25.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:50.3%(+24.5%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Avg Score:25.8%
Providers:0