+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 31.1% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.3% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (83.5%), Winogrande (76.8%), TriviaQA (73.8%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
21 days newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:58.2%(+31.1%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:27.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:58.2%(+31.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:27.1%
Providers:2