+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 6.0% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
21 days newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:72.7%(+6.0%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:66.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:72.7%(+6.0%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:66.7%
Providers:2