+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Base leads with 7.2% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Mistral Small 3 24B Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Base was developed as a 24-billion-parameter foundation model, designed to serve as a base for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide a strong starting point for domain-specific applications, it represents an intermediate-scale option in Mistral's model lineup.
7 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:66.3%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Average Score:73.5%(+7.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:66.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Avg Score:73.5%(+7.2%)
Providers:0