+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 24.2% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.7% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Arena Hard (87.6%), HumanEval (84.8%), MT-Bench (83.5%). The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
7 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:50.3%(+24.2%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Average Score:26.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:50.3%(+24.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Avg Score:26.1%
Providers:2