+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 leads with 26.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 was introduced as the fourth generation of Microsoft's small language model series, designed to push the boundaries of what compact models can achieve. Built with advanced training techniques and architectural improvements, it demonstrates continued progress in efficient, high-quality language models.
5 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:56.4%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:82.6%(+26.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:56.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:82.6%(+26.2%)
Providers:1