+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads with 15.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 32B was created as a larger variant in the Qwen 2.5 family, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities with 32 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring stronger reasoning and generation quality, it represents a powerful option for demanding language understanding tasks.
2 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:68.4%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:84.0%(+15.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:68.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:84.0%(+15.6%)
Providers:0