+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 5.7% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.9% across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (92.7%), GSM8k (91.1%), MBPP (90.2%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:48.1%(+5.7%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:42.3%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
4 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:48.1%(+5.7%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:42.3%
Providers:4