+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3 30B A3B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 21.7% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3 30B A3B is available on 3 providers. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Arena Hard (91.0%), AIME 2024 (80.4%), LiveBench (74.3%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Qwen3 30B A3B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 24 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:46.1%(+21.7%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Average Score:24.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
3 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:46.1%(+21.7%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Avg Score:24.4%
Providers:3