+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 9B vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 37.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Gemma 3 27B is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B was created as a more compact open-source model, designed to deliver capable performance with reduced computational requirements. Built with 9 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it serves applications where efficiency and accessibility are valued alongside the benefits of open-source availability.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
8 months newer
Gemma 2 9B
2024-06-27
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Average Score:49.5%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:86.8%(+37.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Avg Score:49.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:86.8%(+37.3%)
Providers:2