+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 9B vs Gemma 3 4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 4B leads with 9.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3 4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.0%), BoolQ (84.2%), HellaSwag (81.9%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (90.2%), GSM8k (89.2%), DocVQA (75.8%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Gemma 2 9B
2024-06-27
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 38 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Average Score:27.2%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:36.3%(+9.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Avg Score:27.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:36.3%(+9.0%)
Providers:1