+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 9B vs Gemma 3n E4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 9B leads with 5.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 2 9B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B was created as a more compact open-source model, designed to deliver capable performance with reduced computational requirements. Built with 9 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it serves applications where efficiency and accessibility are valued alongside the benefits of open-source availability.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B was developed as a slightly larger edge-optimized variant, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while still fitting within edge computing constraints. Built to serve applications that can accommodate more parameters for improved quality, it expands the range of edge deployment options.
12 months newer
Gemma 2 9B
2024-06-27
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Average Score:71.6%(+5.2%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:66.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Avg Score:71.6%(+5.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:66.4%
Providers:0