+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 9B vs Gemma 3n E4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 9B leads with 18.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 2 9B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.0%), BoolQ (84.2%), HellaSwag (81.9%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
12 months newer
Gemma 2 9B
2024-06-27
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Average Score:57.5%(+18.0%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:39.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Avg Score:57.5%(+18.0%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:39.5%
Providers:0