+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 9B vs Grok-4 Heavy
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 9B leads with 25.3% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 Heavy supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 2 9B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.0%), BoolQ (84.2%), HellaSwag (81.9%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-4 Heavy is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.5% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (100.0%), HMMT25 (96.7%), GPQA (88.4%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Gemma 2 9B
2024-06-27
Grok-4 Heavy
xAI
2025-07-09
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Average Score:47.0%(+25.3%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Average Score:21.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4 Heavy
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Avg Score:47.0%(+25.3%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Avg Score:21.7%
Providers:0