+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 9B vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct leads with 2.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.0%), BoolQ (84.2%), HellaSwag (81.9%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.3% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM-8K (CoT) (84.5%), ARC-C (83.4%), API-Bank (82.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
26 days newer
Gemma 2 9B
2024-06-27
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 31 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Average Score:33.4%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Average Score:35.6%(+2.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Avg Score:33.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Avg Score:35.6%(+2.2%)
Providers:9